-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
RPI5/CM5: add EEPROM programming support #1286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
alexgg
wants to merge
29
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
alexgg/cm5-eeprom
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This has now been moved to the balena-rpi-sb layer's README. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
… support All the secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to its own layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
…support All the secure boot support is being abstracted to its own layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
…upport The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. From meta-balena-raspberrypi @32414ab8285c45c8f8c47d017f3a4a78b0da63e6 Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
This machine has been moved to the meta-balena-rpi-sb layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
… support The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
…t support The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The secure boot and disk encryption support is being abstracted to a different layer. Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
Change-type: patch Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]>
The deployment slug will keep being raspberrypicm4-ioboard-sb until we can integrate the secure boot changes in a single image, but the machine reverts to raspberrypicm4-ioboard as the hardware is the same and the secure boot is just a software feature. Aprt from the coffee file, this updates to workflows to specify a templates path. Changelog-entry: split secure boot and disk encryption support to a layer Signed-off-by: Alex Gonzalez <[email protected]> [SQ] cofee
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.