Skip to content

Conversation

@gcatanese
Copy link
Contributor

@gcatanese gcatanese requested review from a team as code owners December 17, 2025 09:40
@gcatanese gcatanese added the Feature Indicates a new feature addition label Dec 17, 2025
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request integrates support for Adyen's Relayed Authorization Webhooks, a crucial feature for handling real-time authorization decisions within the Balance Platform. It involves the addition of a complete set of data models and a specialized handler to parse and interpret these webhook notifications, ensuring that the system can effectively process and react to authorization requests and their outcomes.

Highlights

  • New Webhook Support: Added comprehensive support for Relayed Authorization Webhooks, enabling the system to process and respond to these specific authorization events from Adyen's Balance Platform.
  • Extensive Model Generation: Introduced numerous new Java model classes to accurately represent the data structures involved in Relayed Authorization Webhooks, including details for amounts, payment instruments, merchant data, and transaction outcomes.
  • Dedicated Webhook Handler: Implemented a dedicated RelayedAuthorisationWebhooksHandler to facilitate the deserialization and processing of incoming relayed authorization webhook payloads.
  • Enhanced Test Coverage: Expanded the existing webhook test suite with a new test case and mock JSON payload to ensure the correct functionality and deserialization of the new Relayed Authorization Webhooks.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds support for Relayed Authorisation Webhooks by introducing a new set of auto-generated model classes and a handler. The changes look good overall, and a test case for the new webhook has been added. I've identified a few minor issues in the generated code and the handler that could be improved for better code quality and clarity.

@gcatanese gcatanese requested a review from galesky-a December 18, 2025 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Feature Indicates a new feature addition

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants