docs(readme): replace value-note with field-note#34
Open
YangScott wants to merge 1 commit intoAztecProtocol:masterfrom
Open
docs(readme): replace value-note with field-note#34YangScott wants to merge 1 commit intoAztecProtocol:masterfrom
YangScott wants to merge 1 commit intoAztecProtocol:masterfrom
Conversation
The directory structure section in the README lists `value-note`, but the actual package in this workspace is `field-note`. This commit updates the package name to reflect the current workspace structure and avoid confusion for users.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The directory structure section in the README lists
value-note, but the actual package in this workspace isfield-note. This commit updates the package name to reflect the current workspace structure and avoid confusion for users.Summary
The directory structure in the README currently lists
value-noteas one of thehelper packages, but the actual package present in this workspace is
field-note.Changes
value-notewithfield-notein the helper types list.Why?
This makes the README consistent with the actual workspace layout and avoids
confusion for users looking for the correct package.