-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 81
Make SkipConnection have the same args as Parallel #1481
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Qfl3x, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a minor API inconsistency by reordering the arguments of the SkipConnection constructor. The change aligns its signature with that of Parallel, making the API more predictable and easier to use for developers. This is a quality-of-life improvement for the library.
Highlights
- API Consistency: The argument order for
SkipConnectionhas been reversed to(connection, layers...)to match theParallelconstructor, improving API consistency. - Documentation Update: The docstring for
SkipConnectionhas been updated to reflect the new argument order and provide a consistent example.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the SkipConnection constructor to align its argument order with Parallel, improving API consistency. The changes in src/layers/containers.jl correctly swap the connection and layers arguments in the positional constructor and update the docstring accordingly. My main concern, which is critical, is that this is a breaking change and the tests have not been updated, which will cause the build to fail.
|
I've updated tests and docs. However, I don't understand the "Bilinear - SkipConnection recombinator" tests; |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1481 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 84.23% 68.34% -15.90%
===========================================
Files 166 153 -13
Lines 6724 6662 -62
===========================================
- Hits 5664 4553 -1111
- Misses 1060 2109 +1049 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
avik-pal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I agree that at some point we need to make this change, we can't do it in v1.x.x due to semantic versioning requirements. I will hold off merging this till we are ready for a breaking major change.
Just a small pet-peeve, feel free to close without pulling. Parallel and SkipConnection don't have the same syntax despite being very similar in their action;
Parallel(connection, layers...)SkipConnection(layers, connection)Since Parallel has splatted
layersargument, I've changed SkipConnection.