Skip to content

Conversation

@harisadam
Copy link

This may be an opinionated PR, but it appears to follow the 37signals approach to setting up the project on your own infrastructure.

Similarly to fizzy-sass, this update also uses a dedicated Gemfile (Gemfile.oss) that resolves a user-specific Rails engine name fizzy-oss (my minimal demo implementation: https://github.com/harisadam/fizzy-oss).

This engine-driven approach provides more flexible customization options for users.

If the team agrees this is the right direction, I’m happy to follow up with documentation in the README.

@harisadam harisadam changed the title fizzy-oss Rails engine option fizzy-oss Rails Engine option Dec 5, 2025
@jorgemanrubia
Copy link
Member

Hi @harisadam, I like this idea! I think we need to streamline a bit more our SaaS setup before tackling this. We have some ergonomics to improve on the dev side (e.g aroun bundler). I would like to tackle that before adding more modes here, but I think this is interesting. CC @flavorjones @kevinmcconnell

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants