Added README badges

[zefir-git]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

README.md was updated to add six Markdown badges (Documentation, GitHub, NPM, Downloads, Licence, CI) linking to corresponding resources. The build/environment guidance now references Vite as a recommended bundler alongside Webpack, noting Webpack as common and Vite also recommended. No other changes were made.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description Check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, so there is insufficient author-written context to verify intent even though the raw_summary shows README badge additions and a minor docs note about Vite; under the described criteria an absent description is effectively too vague to pass. Because the description is missing rather than clearly related or clearly off-topic, the check is inconclusive. The repository-level summary helps but does not replace an author-provided description.	Request the author to add a brief PR description (1–3 sentences) stating the main change (for example: "Add six badges to README and note Vite as an alternative bundler") and any rationale or scope so reviewers have clear context.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "Added README badges" is a short, clear sentence that directly matches the primary change in the raw_summary — adding six badges to README.md; it is concise, specific, and free of noise or vague terms. The title highlights the most important change from the developer's perspective and would be understandable to a teammate scanning history. It therefore satisfies the guidance for a good PR title.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch badges

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c1e1906 and 3d6100e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (1)

📚 Learning: 2025-03-04T10:15:44.949Z

Learnt from: zefir-git
PR: cloudnode-pro/components#63
File: src/SvgComponent.ts:34-36
Timestamp: 2025-03-04T10:15:44.949Z
Learning: In the cldn/components codebase, JSDoc comments aren't duplicated for overridden methods when they're already documented in the parent class or interface. The documentation is considered to be inherited.

Applied to files:

• README.md