Skip to content

Conversation

@bep
Copy link
Member

@bep bep commented Dec 2, 2025

Note that this works, but the building blocks are quickly thrown together just to get a sense if this makes sense to go forward with.

See #12843

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

@github-actions

This comment was marked as outdated.

@bep
Copy link
Member Author

bep commented Dec 3, 2025

As to performance:

  • I have pushed an update that uses Wazero's latest con current compiler, which gets the "init WASM" step down from 130ms to 70ms on my MacBook. This is more or less the diff I see when building your test site with this branch and the master branch.
  • In the final setup we will also cache the comiled WASM files to disk (like we do for Katex) and, also, if you have the images cached to disk, it will be as fast as before.

@jmooring
Copy link
Member

jmooring commented Dec 3, 2025

Other than a stray debug statement, this looks good to me.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants