feat: support Next.js/Nuxt.js-style dynamic route parameters in patterns#44
Open
azhukov-gyg wants to merge 2 commits intohmarr:mainfrom
Open
feat: support Next.js/Nuxt.js-style dynamic route parameters in patterns#44azhukov-gyg wants to merge 2 commits intohmarr:mainfrom
azhukov-gyg wants to merge 2 commits intohmarr:mainfrom
Conversation
feat: support dynamic route parameters in patterns
lukealbao
added a commit
to lukealbao/co
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds support for Next.js/Nuxt.js-style dynamic route parameters in CODEOWNERS patterns, addressing issue #42.
Modern web frameworks like Next.js and Nuxt.js use square brackets [paramName] in file and directory names to denote dynamic route parameters. This is a fundamental pattern in these frameworks' file-based routing systems.
Examples:
Currently, CODEOWNERS rejects such patterns with an error: