Skip to content

Conversation

@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor

Adding descriptions for building the binary and running the tests

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 24, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@JianLi-RH: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Adding descriptions for building the binary and running the tests

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Walkthrough

Rewrote cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md to add a "Build the executable binary" section, replace framework-focused instructions with binary-centric workflows, and add "Using the binary" and "Using ginkgo-cli" subsections with commands for listing, focusing, and running tests. (48 words)

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Documentation restructuring
cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md
Added "Build the executable binary" with make build; replaced framework-based local test instructions with binary-based examples using _output/.../cluster-version-operator-tests; introduced info, list, run-suite, and run-test binary commands; added "Using ginkgo-cli" subsection (install, list, focus/run tests); clarified test-name terminology and output wording.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Verify the make build command and the _output/.../cluster-version-operator-tests binary path are accurate.
  • Confirm the info, list, run-suite, and run-test example flags/arguments match the test binary CLI.
  • Check ginkgo-cli installation and --focus/--skip example syntax for correctness.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e050c0 and 1cc621c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md

10-10: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


18-18: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


24-24: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


33-33: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md (3)

7-11: ✓ Build section is clear and well-positioned.

The new "Build the executable binary" section provides clear, concise instructions that align with the PR's goal of adding binary-building guidance.


15-26: ✓ Binary usage instructions are practical and discoverable.

The section clearly documents both run-suite and run-test workflows, with helpful commands to list available test suites and tests. The structure makes it easy for users to discover and run specific tests.


28-37: ✓ Typo fixed and ginkgo-cli section is complete.

The heading typo from the previous review ("ginko-cli" → "ginkgo-cli") has been corrected, and the section now includes the suggested content about the --focus flag for filtering tests. Documentation is clear and properly references the official ginkgo resources.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

Knowledge base: Disabled due to Reviews -> Disable Knowledge Base setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between df1ec55 and dc02c52.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**

⚙️ CodeRabbit configuration file

-Focus on major issues impacting performance, readability, maintainability and security. Avoid nitpicks and avoid verbosity.

Files:

  • cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
cmd/cluster-version-operator-tests/README.md

10-10: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


18-18: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


24-24: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


33-33: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)


37-37: Dollar signs used before commands without showing output

(MD014, commands-show-output)

@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @hongkailiu @DavidHurta

@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @hongkailiu @DavidHurta

Copy link
Member

@hongkailiu hongkailiu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only a couple of minors. Otherwise, LGTM.

Adding descriptions for building the binary and running the tests
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Nov 28, 2025
@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor Author

Need verified label? cc @jhou1 @dis016 @jiajliu @shahsahil264

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 3, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidHurta, hongkailiu, JianLi-RH

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [DavidHurta,hongkailiu]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@DavidHurta
Copy link
Contributor

/verified bypass

A smaller documentation change.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@DavidHurta: The verified label has been added.

Details

In response to this:

/verified bypass

A smaller documentation change.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified by @JianLi-RH

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@JianLi-RH: This PR has been marked as verified by @JianLi-RH.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @JianLi-RH

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@JianLi-RH
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD d4cb3b0 and 2 for PR HEAD 1cc621c in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 7cebe65 and 1 for PR HEAD 1cc621c in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2025

@JianLi-RH: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-images 1cc621c link true /test okd-scos-images

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants