Skip to content

Conversation

@matteobruni
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 20, 2025 18:49
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 20, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@matteobruni has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 30 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 098c307 and dcf0303.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • vitest.config.ts (1 hunks)

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch dev

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates the @tsparticles/cli dependency to version 3.0.11 and modifies the test timeout configuration. The lockfile has been updated to reflect the new version and clean up unused older dependency versions.

  • Updated @tsparticles/cli from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
  • Modified test timeout from 60 seconds to 5 minutes (300 seconds)
  • Cleaned up unused dependency versions in lockfile (older versions of eslint plugins, tsdoc, and jsdoc-related packages)

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
vitest.config.ts Changed test timeout from 60000ms to 5 * 60 * 1000ms (60s to 300s)
package.json Updated @tsparticles/cli dependency from ^3.0.10 to ^3.0.11
pnpm-lock.yaml Updated lockfile to reflect new @tsparticles/cli version and removed unused older dependency versions
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

environment: "node",
include: ["tests/**/*.test.ts"],
testTimeout: 60000
testTimeout: 5 * 60 * 1000
Copy link

Copilot AI Dec 20, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This change increases the test timeout from 60 seconds (60000ms) to 5 minutes (300000ms). If the intention was to simply make the timeout value more readable by using an expression, the equivalent would be "1 * 60 * 1000" or "60 * 1000". Please verify that this 5x increase in timeout is intentional.

Suggested change
testTimeout: 5 * 60 * 1000
testTimeout: 60 * 1000

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@matteobruni matteobruni merged commit c86e1d6 into main Dec 20, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants