Skip to content

Conversation

@sylvestre
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 1, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.29%. Comparing base (de9bf94) to head (3e02493).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #157      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.26%   86.29%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines        6212     6233      +21     
  Branches      521      522       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         5359     5379      +20     
- Misses        852      853       +1     
  Partials        1        1              
Flag Coverage Δ
macos_latest 86.24% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
ubuntu_latest 86.33% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
windows_latest 20.16% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit 8c8c1db into main Jan 1, 2026
42 checks passed
@sylvestre sylvestre deleted the cargo-dist-2 branch January 1, 2026 19:33
# Config for 'cargo dist'
[workspace.metadata.dist]
# The preferred cargo-dist version to use in CI (Cargo.toml SemVer syntax)
cargo-dist-version = "0.12.0"
Copy link
Contributor

@cakebaker cakebaker Jan 2, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it intentional that you use an old version of cargo-dist? The current version is 0.30.3.

Update: in dist-workspace.toml you use the current version whereas in release.yml the old version is used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants